"Bharti's application for injunction to restrain EWL and other Respondents from proceeding with the hearing on the assessment of damages in the pending arbitration, came up for hearing today before a Lagos High Court. Bharti's counsel however abandoned the said application for injunction and instead opted that the substantive application to set aside the partial award be heard. In view of this, the court ordered accelerated hearing of the application to set aside the award and adjourned same till the 25th of April 2012."
"The move follows a Nigerian court ruling on Jan. 30 that Bharti Airtel's ownership of its subsidiary Airtel Nigeria is "null and void" because co-founder and 5 percent shareholder Econet was not consulted on the transfer.
South Africa-based Econet Wireless is disputing the Indian company's ownership of one of its top Africa operations. Bharti said last month that its stake in its Nigerian unit was "completely safe" and that the world's fifth-biggest mobile phone carrier by subscribers had appealed against the verdict.
"The claim for damages and equitable compensation against the Applicant and some of the Respondents might be in excess of $3 Billion," the document filed to the court said. "The above estimated damages might also be in addition to a claim for $100 Million received by the Applicant as fees for the management of VNL (Vee Networks Limited, a former name of Airtel) for a period of 6 years which sum should have accrued."
Bharti Airtel inherited the legal case as part of a $9 billion acquisition of Zain's Africa operations in 2010, including 65 percent of Zain Nigeria. The basis of Econet's claim is that its 5 percent stake was unfairly cancelled when Zain took control, so any decision made since then without it, including the transfer to Bharti, is void. The Nigerian court upheld that claim.
Nigeria contributes about 9.5 percent to Bharti's consolidated operational profits, the company says.Econet disputed the buyout of Airtel's stake from Zain Nigeria in 2010 because its right of first refusal over the stake was denied, in a dispute that had been ongoing since 2003, when the same assets were first sold to Vee Networks." (Reuters 22 February 2012)